Mukul v. G. Jansi Rani & ORS.

#9 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1151/2015 & I.A. 21076/2015, I.A. 10309/2016, I.A. 12440/2016, I.A. 7593/2018 MUKUL ..... Plaintiff Through Plaintiff in person.

versus G. JANSI RANI & ORS.

..... Defendants Through Mr. Vipin Yadav, Advocate with Ms. Preeti Bhatia, SPA holder of defendants.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

O R D E R

% 15.10.2018 I.A. 12996/2018 Though the present application has been filed under Order 23 Rule 3 read with Section 89 CPC, yet the application is difficult to comprehend. Plaintiff, who appears in person, prays that he be allowed to unconditionally withdraw the present suit.

Learned counsel for the defendants has no objection to unconditional withdrawal of the present suit.

Consequently, present suit is dismissed as unconditionally withdrawn. Since issues have not been framed in the present case, Registry is directed to issue to the plaintiff a certificate authorizing him to receive back from the Collector the full amount of the Court fee paid by him in the present suit.

MANMOHAN, J OCTOBER 15, 2018 rn