← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./2113/2017

Yogesh Kumar Mishra @ Golu & ORS v. State Of NCT Of Delhi & ANR

2018-05-14Hon'Ble Mr. Justice A.K. Pathak2 pages

$~64 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 2113/2017 YOGESH KUMAR MISHRA @ GOLU & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Sunil Dahiya, Adv.

versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. M.S. Oberoi, APP with ASI Surender Singh, P.S. Aman Vihar Respondent no. 2 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 14.05.2018 It is submitted that petitioners and respondent no. 2 are neighbours. They have settled their disputes amicably; therefore, FIR 737/2014 under Sections 354-A/509/34 IPC registered at police station Aman Vihar and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom may be quashed. Respondent no. 2 is present in Court and has been identified by ASI Surender Singh of police station Aman Vihar.

Respondent no. 2 admits having settled the matter with petitioners of her own free will, voluntarily and without any undue force, pressure or coercion.

Petitioners have paid `15,000/- to respondent no. 2 in order to compensate her towards mental pain and agony

suffered by her. Respondent no. 2 says that she has no objection in case FIR is quashed against the petitioners.

Keeping in mind the settlement arrived at between the petitioners and respondent no. 2 voluntarily, in my view, no fruitful purpose would be served to keep the criminal proceedings pending. Accordingly, in the interest of justice, aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti. A.K. PATHAK, J.

MAY 14, 2018 r.bararia