Sanjay & ORS. v. State & ORS.

$-41/52 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 2832/2016 SANJAY & QRS.

Petitioners Through :Mr. Habib-ur-Rahman and Mr. R.K.

Rajwanshi, Advs.

versus STATE & QRS.

Respondents Through :Ms. Nandita Rao, ASC with Ms.

Srilina Roy, Adv. and SI Satbir Singh, P.S. Chhawla for the State Respondent no. 3 in person.

AND + W.P.(CRL) 2847/2016 DHARMENDER @ BITU & QRS.

Petitioners Through :Mr. Avdhesh Kumar Singh and Mr.

Rajender Kumar Singh, Advs.

versus STATE & QRS.

Through Respondents :Ms. Kamna Vohra, ASC and SI Satbir Singh, P.S. Chhawala for the State Respondent no. 4 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK %

ORDER

27.09.2016 Crl. M.A. No. 15205/2016 (exemption^ Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. By:AMULYA

W.P.rCRL) Nos. 2832/2016 & 2847/2016 Petitioners and private respondents are neighbours. A quarrel ensued between them, in which both the parties sustained injuries resulting in registration of following cross FlRs:- (a) FIR No. 236/2016 under Sections 308/34 IPG registered at P.S. Chhawala on the complaint of respondent no. 3 Ms. Sarika in W.P.(Crl.) No. 2832/2016.

(b) FIR No. 235/2016 under Sections 308/323/34 IPG registered at P.S. Ghhawala on the complaint of respondent no. 4 Ms. Suman in W.P.(Grl.) No. 2847/2016.

Petitioners and private respondents have settled their disputes amicably vide Gompromise Deed dated 24*'' August, 2016, inasmuch as they want to maintain harmonious relation in future. Gomplainants/injured in both the FIRs are not willing to pursue their respective FIRs. They are present in Gourt and have been identified by SI Satbir Singh, P.S. Ghhawala. Keeping in mind the fact that a quarrel ensued between the neighbours on some trivial matter, wherein injured persons sustained simple injuries and a compromise has been entered into between them, in my view, ( no iBruitful purpose would be served to keep the criminal proceedings

pending. Accordingly, in the interest of justice both the FIRs, that is, FIR No. 236/2016 under Sections 308/34 IPG and FIR No. 235/2016 under Sections 308/323/34 IPG both registered at P.S. Ghhawala, which are at the investigation stage, are quashed.

Both the writ petitions are disposed of in the above terms. Dasti. A.K. PATHAK, J.

SEPTEMBER 27,2016 rb