Jai Bhagwan Mittal v. Neeraj Mohan Sahu

$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 487/2017 and C.M. No.18417/2017(stay) JAI BHAGWAN MITTAL ..... Appellant Through:

Appellant in person.

versus NEERAJ MOHAN SAHU ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Jitin Mann, Advocate with Mr.

Kulvinder Singh, Advocate (M.

Nos.9873558888 & 9810532971).

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA

O R D E R

% 12.10.2018 1.

As agreed to by the counsel for the respondent/plaintiff, impugned judgment is set aside by holding that filing of vakalatnama on behalf of the appellant/defendant for his appearance is sufficient and any minor delay in filing of the appearance is condoned. Respondent/plaintiff will serve upon the appellant/defendant, in accordance with law, summons for judgment and trial court will expeditiously decide the application for leave to defend without giving unnecessary adjournments to the appellant/defendant.

RFA No.487/2017 page of 2

2.

Accordingly, this appeal is allowed and disposed of as stated above.

3.

Parties to appear before the District & Sessions Judge, North West, Rohini Courts, Delhi on 2nd November, 2018 and the District & Sessions Judge will now mark the Order 37 CPC suit for disposal to a competent court in accordance with law.

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J OCTOBER 12, 2018 Ne RFA No.487/2017 of 2