High Court of DelhiBAIL APPLN./821/2015
Sonu Kumar v. State
2017-04-12Hon'Ble Mr. Justice S.P.Garg1 pages
$~2 *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ BAIL APPLN. 821/2015 & Crl.M.B.3420/2015 SONU KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through :
None.
versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :
Ms.Manjeet Arya, APP.
Complainant present in person.
W/SI Seema, PS New Friends Colony.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG
O R D E R
% 12.04.2017 1.
None is present on behalf of the petitioner despite previous pass-over.
Same was the position on the previous date of hearing also.
2.
Vide order dated 6.2.2017, due to petitioner's absence, costs of `10,000/- was imposed. Costs has not yet been paid. 3.
Today also, complainant is present since morning. 4.
The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. S.P.GARG, J.
APRIL 12, 2017/sa