Radhey Shyam v. State

$~11 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 1816/2016 RADHEY SHYAM ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr.Arvind K.Gupta, Advocate with Mr.Puneet Mittal, Ms.Alpana Malik & Mr.Sagar Mittal, Advocates.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :

Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 22.11.2016 1.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.213/2016 registered under Sections 376/506/34 IPC at PS Chhawla. Status report is on record.

2.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. By an order dated 06.09.2016, the petitioner was granted interim protection and was directed to join the investigation as and when required. Undisputedly, the petitioner has joined the investigation since then. The parties are related to each other. Family disputes have been settled amicably vide settlement deed dated 06.06.2016. Status report reveals that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.

BAIL APPLN. 1816/2016

3.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail and in the event of arrest, he be released on furnishing personal bond in the sum of ` 50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the SHO/Investigating officer. He shall, however, join the investigation as and when required.

4.

The bail application stands disposed of.

S.P.GARG, J.

NOVEMBER 22, 2016 / tr BAIL APPLN. 1816/2016