← Library
High Court of DelhiBAIL APPLN./824/2017

Sandeep v. State NCT Of Delhi

2017-09-15Hon'Ble Mr. Justice I.S.Mehta2 pages

$~11 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 824/2017 SANDEEP ..... Petitioner Through:

Ms.Chitra Goswami, Adv.

versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through:

Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP for State ASI Babulal, PS-Mangolpuri

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA

O R D E R

% 15.09.2017 The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.258/2017 registered under Sections 323/341/308/34 IPC, at PS Mangol Puri.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an innocent person and has no nexus with the FIR in question. She further submits that the petitioner has already joined investigation and nothing is to be recovered at the instance of the petitioner and the petitioner is not required for custodial investigation. She further submits that there is no evidence qua against the present petitioner. She further submits that the injured have already been discharged from the hospital. She further submits that the petitioner is ready to join further investigation as and when required and prays that the petitioner be granted anticipatory bail. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the bail application.

Learned APP on instructions from the Investigating Officer submits that both the injured have been discharged from the hospital and one of the injured was discharged from the hospital after 10 days. However, the learned APP on instructions from the Investigating Officer admits that the petitioner has joined the investigation.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is directed to further join the investigation and in the event of his arrest, he be released on bail, on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the SHO/Investigating officer concerned with the condition that the petitioner shall not influence the prosecution witnesses; the petitioner shall not tamper the prosecution evidence and the petitioner should not leave India without prior permission of the Court below.

The present bail application is allowed and disposed of accordingly. Copy of this order be given dasti.

I.S.MEHTA, J SEPTEMBER 15, 2017/sr