Union Of India v. Prem Matiyani

$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10222/2016 & CMs 40348 - 40351/2016 UNION OF INDIA ..... Petitioner Through Mr Ruchir Mishra, Adv.

versus PREM MATIYANI ..... Respondent Through Ms Padma Kumar S., Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 07.11.2016 Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that since the respondent has expired, the present writ petition has become infructuous. In the present case, the Tribunal had quashed the charge-sheet dated 21/22.06.2010. It is pointed out that the disciplinary proceedings, pursuant to the quashing of charge-sheet had not culminated in a punishment order. The respondent had retired on 30.06.2010.

In view of the aforesaid statement, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. All legal questions are left open. SANJIV KHANNA, J SUNITA GUPTA, J NOVEMBER 07, 2016/rd