Prashant v. State & ANR

$~37.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2810/2016 PRASHANT ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC with Insp Pawanjeet Kaur Mr. Kumar Singh and Mr. Manoj Kumar for R-2

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

O R D E R

% 26.09.2016 Issue notice. Notice is accepted on behalf of the State. Respondent No.2 is present with her counsel and accepts notice. She is identified by her counsel, whose vakalatnama is on record.

The petitioner has preferred the present petition to seek the quashing of FIR No.168/2015 under Section 66(C)/67 of the Information Technology Act and the proceedings arising therefrom. The petition is premised on a settlement arrived at between the petitioner and the complainant. The affidavit of the complainant is also on record. She states that she is no longer interested in pursuing the compliant and joins the prayer for quashing of the FIR in question.

The petitioner, who is present in court, has assured the court that he shall not indulge in any such conduct in future. Accordingly, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding further with the FIR in question and the proceedings emanating therefrom. The same are hereby quashed.

Dasti.

VIPIN SANGHI, J SEPTEMBER 26, 2016 sr