Ravi Gaurav v. State (NCT Of Delhi)

$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1953/2018 and Crl. M.A. 30374/2018 RAVI GAURAV ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vinod Dubey, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP with ASI Hari Singh

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA

O R D E R

% 21.08.2018 The incident which allegedly occurred on 06.05.2018 was reported to the police on 28.05.2018, there being no explanation offered at that stage for the delay. The petitioner while seeking anticipatory bail refers, inter alia, to the past conduct of the first informant in which regard, a report had been lodged with the police on 02.09.2016 vide DD entry no.61B. It appears that the petitioner and the first informant live in the same neighbourhood and there have been quarrels in the past including over the conduct of the first informant in throwing garbage from her house towards the house of the petitioner to which exception had been taken. Both the petitioner and the first informant are married persons with members of the family living with them. The incident allegedly occurred at 10.30 p.m. There is no explanation in the FIR as to the presence of

other members of the family of the complainant at the relevant point of time.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances a case for release of the applicant / petitioner on anticipatory bail is made out. Thus, it is directed that in the event of the petitioner being arrested, he shall be released on bail by the arresting officer on furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety in the like amount subject to the following further conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall continue cooperating with the investigation and join the same as and when called upon to do so; (ii) The petitioner shall not come in contact with or try to influence any of the witnesses connected to the case;

(iii) Prior to his release, he shall give the telephone numbers of self and of at least one other responsible family member besides that of the surety to the investigating officer;

(iv) He shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;

(v) This order will inure only till the date of first appearance of the petitioner in the event of a charge-sheet being filed on conclusion of the investigation and process being issued against him by the court of cognizance.

The petition and the application filed therewith stands disposed

of in above terms.

Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master. R.K.GAUBA, J AUGUST 21, 2018 Yg