Sandeep @ Tinku v. State (NCT Of Delhi)

Signed By:RAM DATT Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

$-39 & 40 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.REV.P.

684/2014 & CRL. M.A.I7566/2014 RAJENDER @ RAJU Petitioner Through:

Mr. Roopansh Purohit, Adv.

versus THE STATE(NCT OF DELHI) Respondent Through:

Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP + CRL.REV.P.

685/2014 & CRL.M.A. 17594/2014 SANDEEP @ TINKU .... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Roopansh Purohit, Adv.

versus STATE(NCTOFDELHI) Respondent Through:

Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR

ORDER

% 24.04.2017 After some arguments,learnedcounselfor the petitionerseeks permission to withdraw these petitions.

The revision petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. It has been submitted that one witness has been examined by the Trial Court. The TrialCourtis requestedto expeditethetrial and concludeit positively within a period of nine months from today.

A-a.L~Uit ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J APRIL 24, 2017/ns