Shagufta v. State

$~52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 2009/2018 SHAGUFTA ..... Petitioner Represented by:

Ms.Jyoti Gupta and Mr.Javed Akhtar, Advocates versus STATE ..... Respondent Represented by:

Ms.Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for the State with ASI Vijay Kumar, PS Seelam Pur

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 28.08.2018 Crl.M.A.No.30877/2018 Allowed subject to just exceptions.

Bail Appn.No.2009/2018 1.

Admittedly the first application for anticipatory bail filed by the petitioner before this Court was dismissed as withdrawn on 4th April, 2018. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said application was withdrawn because the Court was not inclined to grant the anticipatory bail for the reason the injury was opined to be grievous in nature. 3.

Pursuant to a PCR call dated 3rd August, 2016, FIR No.398/2016 was registered for offences punishable under Sections 323/341/34 IPC at PS Seelampur on the complaint of Mushtak, father of the petitioner and since BAIL APPLN. 2009/2018

the offences were bailable, bail was granted. However subsequently final opinion on the injury of Tahir the injured was received which was opined to be grievous in nature hence Sections 308/326 IPC were added to the investigation. Since all these facts were duly before this Court and there are no new facts, petition is dismissed.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

AUGUST 28, 2018 mamta BAIL APPLN. 2009/2018