Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -18 v. Maharani Of India

3> Signed By:RAM DATT Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

$-21 to 25 .

.

'

* the HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + . . ITA 872/2017 + ITA 873/2017 ,+ ITA 874/2017 + ITA 877/2017 arid + ITA 878/2017 - PR. COMMISSIONEROF INCOMETAX -18 .....Appellant Through Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Courisel and Mr. Deepak Anand, Jr.

Standing Counsel >.

\ versus '

• • .

'

MAHARANIOF INDIA .....Respondent Through Mr. Rohit Jain and Mr. Aniket D.

Agrawal, Advocate ,

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR/JUSTICE CHANDER SHEIOIAR

ORDER

«/o 27.08.2018 Counsel for the appellant/Revenuestates that the tax effect in the presentappeals relatingto assessmentyear 2003-2004to 20072008 is belowRs.50 Lacs and hence, in terms of circularNo. 3/2018 dated 11.07.2018, the substantial question of law framed in the appealsneednotbe answeredandthe appealsmay be disposedof. Recordingthe aforesaidstatement,the appeals are disposedof withoutansweringthe substantialquestionoflawwhichisleftopen. SANJIV KHANNA, J ghandeC^ekhar,J AUGUST 27,2018/b