Geeta Anand v. M/S Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd & ORS
$-15, 16, 17 & 18 ^
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
* FAO(OS) 248/2015 & CM No. 8233/2015 + MSGEETAANAND Through:
Mr Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Ms Jasleen Oberoi, Ms Surbhi Mehta, Mr S. Divedi and Mr Deepro Guha, Advocates versus M/S INDIABULLS REAL ESTATE LTD & ORS Respondents Through:
Mr Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate with Mr Rishi Agarwala, Mr Anuj Malhotra, Mr Karan Luthra, Mr Avishkar Singhvi, Advocates for R-1 Mr Arvind Nigam, Sr. Advocate with Mr Sulabh Rewari, Advocate for R-2 + FAO(OS) 249/2015 & CM No. 8254/2015 GEETAANAND Appellant Through:
Mr Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Ms Jasleen Oberoi, Ms Surbhi Mehta, Mr S. Divedi and Mr Deepro Guha, Advocates versus M/S INDIABULLS HOUSING FINANCE LTD & ORS Respondents Through:
Mr Rajat Jain, Advocate for R-1 Mr Arvind Nigam, Sr. Advocate with Mr Sulabh Rewari, Advocate for R-5 + FAO(OS) 327/2015 & CM Nos. 11312/2015 and 11317/2015 DOW JONES & COMPANY Appellant Through:
Mr Arvind Nigam, Sr. Advocate with Mr Sulabh Rewari, Advocate versus M/S INDIABULLS HOUSING FINANCE LTD & ORS Respondents Through:
Mr Rajat Jain, Advocate for R-1 By:AMULYA
Mr Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Ms Jasleen Oberoi, Ms Surbhi Mehta, Mr S. Divedi and Mr Deepro Guha, Advocates for R-25 + FAO(OS) 329/2015 & CM Nos. 11320/2015 and 11325/2015 DOW JONES & COMPANY Appellant Through:
Mr Arvind Nigam, Sr. Advocate with Mr Sulabh Rewari, Advocate versus M/S INDIABULLS REAL ESTATE LTD & ORS Respondents Through:
Mr Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate with Mr Rishi Agarwala, Mr Anuj Malhotra, Mr Karan Luthra, Mr Avishkar Singhvi, Advocates for R-1 Mr Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Ms Jasleen Oberoi, Ms Surbhi Mehta, Mr S. Divedi and Mr Deepro Guha, Advocates for R-2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
ORDER
% 07.09.2015 We have heard the counsel for the parties.
The counsel are agreed that the order dated 16.04.2015 passed by the learned Single Judge be modified to the extent that the appellants would be free to publish the article subject to their complying with the norms of journalistic conduct as issued by the Press Trust of India (2010 Edition) and, particularly with regard to paragraphs nos. 12, 14, 15 and 26 thereof. A questionnaire has been sent by Ms Geeta Anand to respondent no. 1 in these appeals through e-mails dated 14.04.2015 and 27.07.2015. It has been agreed that the respondent no. 1 in these appeals shall give the response to Ms Geeta Anand on or before 10 a.m. (1ST) on 14.09.2015. In view of the above order, the appeals stand disposed of.
;u The learned counsel for the parties may move appropriate applications for disposal of the suit with regard to the appellants herein before the learned Single Judge. Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master. BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J Cm;
f>0-- SEPTEMBER 07,2015 SANiEEV SACHDEVA, J rs