← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/4315/2017

Ranjana Rohit Chauhan v. Union Of India And ORS

2017-05-19Hon'Ble Mr. Justice V. Kameswar Rao2 pages

$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4315/2017, CM Nos. 18789-18790/2017 RANJANA ROHIT CHAUHAN ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Sunil Kumar, Mr.K.K.Sain, Mr.Vipin, Advs.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Ms.Monika Arora, CGSC with Mr.Harsh Ahuja, Adv. for UOI Mr.Jagjit Singh, Adv. for Railways

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO

O R D E R

% 19.05.2017 CM No.18789/2017 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of.

W.P. (C) 4315/2017 and CM No.18790/2017 (for direction) The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:

i) Pass an appropriate order or directions thereby quashing / setting aside the impugned letter / order dated 4.03.2014 qua petitioner passed by the respondent No.3 and direct the respondents to give proper Maternity Leave / Child Care Leave to the petitioner from 8.6.2013 to 20.09.2017.

ii) Direct the respondents to release the salary for the total period of Maternity Leave / Child Care Leave to the petitioner after regularizing the leave which she is entitled except the without pay leave;

iii) Direct the respondents to regularize the leave of the petitioner which has been taken by her from the department concerned time to time for the purpose of bounding between the children and welfare of the children as the petitioner is very much entitled to get the maternity leave / CCL leave;

iv) Direct the respondents to include the new born babies in the family medical insurance card as well as other benefits of the newly born children.

v) Any other or further order or relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the fact and circumstances of the case be also passed / granted in favour of the petitioner and against the respondents in the interest of justice.

It is a conceded position that the petitioner is an employee of Northern Railway and the dispute is a service dispute. The Northern Railway is under the jurisdiction of Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT). The learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach Central Administrative Tribunal. With the liberty as prayed for, the petition and the application are dismissed as withdrawn.

V. KAMESWAR RAO, J MAY 19, 2017/akb