Religare Finest Limited v. The State & ORS

4-10 &

39. .

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

* CRL.L.P.

CRL.L.P.

CRL.L.P.

CRL.L.P.

CRL.L.P.

CRL.L.P.

+ + + + + + + + + + "

+ 126/2015 127/2015 and Crl.M.A.

and Crl.M.A.

and Crl.M.A.

and Crl.M.A.

and Cfl.M.A.

and Crl.M.A.

and Crl.M.A.

and Crl.M.A.

Nos.3739 Nos.3752 -41/2015 -54/2015 128/2015 ■57/2015 ■60/2015 Nos.3755 Nos.3758 129/2015 130/2015 ■63/2015 •66/2015 69/2015 75/2015 78/2015 81/2015 72/2015 Nos.3761 Nos.3764 Nos.3767 Nos.3773 131/2015 CRL.L.P.

CRL.L.P.

132/2015 134/2015 CRL.L.P.

CRL.L.P.

CRL.L.P.

135/2015 and Crl.M.A.

and Crl.M.A.

and Crl.M.A.

Nos.3776 136/2015 Nos.3779.

133/2015 Nos.3770RELIGARE FINEST LIMITED Through:

None.

Petitioner versus'

THE STATE & ORS O .» V Through:

Mr. Rajat Katyal, AFP for the State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI Respondents,

ORDER

28.04.2015 % Despite pass-over, none has appeared for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is no longer interestjt^n pursuing these petitions as it was °Wi< informed to the Court on the last date that a fresh set of cheques has been % issued by the respondent accused after passing of the impugrred order by the learned Magistrate.

ft Consequently, the petitions are dismiss.ed in default. VIPIN SANGHI, J APRIL 28, 2015 B.S. Rohella By:AMULYA