Shree Ganpati Traders v. The Commissioner Value Added Tax

$~114-117 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) Nos.7904/2016, 7905/2016, 7906/2016 & 7907/2016 SHREE GANPATI TRADERS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Chandhok with Mr. Rahul Gupta and Mr. Ranjeet Singh, Advocates.

versus THE COMMISSIONER VALUE ADDED TAX ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ensha Chhabra, proxy for Ms.

Meenakashi Midha, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA

O R D E R

% 18.10.2016 It is stated that refund of the principal amounts have been received. Petitioner also submitted that some amounts towards interest have also been received. However, counsel submits that entire interest amounts are as yet unpaid and that an application in this regard has been moved to the VATO. VATO shall pass appropriate orders on it within three weeks.

Subject to these directions, the writ petitions stand disposed of. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J DEEPA SHARMA, J OCTOBER 18, 2016/vikas/