Merck Kgaa & ANR v. Madan Lal & ORS

$~18 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CS(OS) 3534/2014 MERCK KGAA & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through :Mr. Karan Bajaj and Ms. Adya, Advs.

versus MADAN LAL & ORS ..... Defendants Through : Mr. Rajiv Verma, defendant no. 4 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 02.11.2015 IA No. 20623/2015 (under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC) Parties have settled their disputes on the terms and conditions as stipulated in this application, which has been signed by the authorized representatives of the plaintiffs as well as the defendants and the application has also been supported by the affidavits of the parties. Parties shall remain bound by the terms of settlement. I do not find the terms of settlement to be in conflict with any law.

Application is marked as "Mark C-1".

Accordingly, a decree is passed in terms of "Mark C-1", which shall form part of the decree.

Since parties have settled their disputes at the initial stage and before

commencement of the trial, let 50% of the court fee be refunded to the plaintiffs and necessary certificate, in this regard, be issued to the plaintiffs by the Registry.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

NOVEMBER 02, 2015 rb