Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd & ANR v. Dabur India Limited

$~41 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ FAO(OS) 492/2014 & CM 19271/2014 RECKITT BENCKISER (INDIA) LTD & ANR ..... Appellants Through :

Mr Chander M. Lall with Ms Nancy Roy versus DABUR INDIA LIMITED ..... Respondent Through :

Mr Sudhir K. Makkar with Ms Meenakshi Singh

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

O R D E R

% 11.03.2015 The learned counsel for the respondent has taken instructions. He states that without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties, the respondent shall not use the device of 'fireman/ firemen' in any of the advertisements relating to the product in question (Pudin Hara) or any variant thereof. This undertaking shall also apply to any use in relation to the aforesaid product. The formal undertaking will be submitted by the respondent before the learned Single Judge within a week. The learned counsel for the respondent also undertakes that the existing advertisement would be discontinued within two months from today. The counsel for the parties agree that the suit may be decreed in terms of the undertakings and the agreements between the parties.

In view of the above position, the learned counsel for the appellant states that they shall not press for the other reliefs in the suit. An appropriate application shall be

moved before the learned Single Judge within a week along with the above undertakings.

The appeal stands disposed of in terms of the above. BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J MARCH 11, 2015 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J SR