Deepak Chauhan @ Deepu v. State ( Govt Of NCT Of Delhi) & ANR
$~26 *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.M.C. 5419/2014 DEEPAK CHAUHAN @ DEEPU ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Ghanshyam Vashisht, Adv. with Mr.M.K.Vashisht, Adv.
versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr.Kamal Kr. Ghei, APP for the State along with SI Parveen, PS Ranhola, in person.
Respondent No.2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH
O R D E R
% 10.06.2016 Crl. M.A. No.9817/2016 (for early hearing) Learned APP for the State as well as the respondent No.2/complainant have no objection if the prayer made in the application is allowed and the petition is taken up today itself. Ordered accordingly. The application is disposed of.
Crl. M.C. No.5419/2014 & Crl. M.A. No.9818/2016 (u/s 482 Cr.P.C.) Petitioner and respondent No.2 are present in Court who have been identified by the counsel for the petitioner. This is a petition filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashing of FIR No.469/2013, under Sections 452/325/308/34 IPC, Police Station Ranhola, Delhi.
Brief facts of the case are that the respondent No.2 allegedly suffered injuries at the hands of the petitioner and the other persons. Thereafter, he was taken to the hospital. Consequently, on the basis of the statement of the respondent No.2, the aforesaid FIR was registered against the petitioner and three other accused persons.
It is stated that during the pendency of the proceedings, the matter has been compromised with the intervention of the respectable persons of the locality between the petitioner and respondent No.2 only, thus, respondent No.2 does not want to initiate any further proceedings against the petitioner. Respondent No.2 is present before Court.
He has confirmed the same.
Learned APP for the State has no objection if the FIR qua the petitioner only be quashed in view of the settlement.
In view of the averments made in the petition, I am of the opinion that no useful purpose would be served in continuing the the proceedings arising out of the above said FIR against the petitioner. Accordingly, the proceedings arisen from the FIR No.469/2013, under Sections 452/325/308/34 IPC, Police Station Ranhola, Delhi, are hereby quashed qua the petitioner only. It is clarified that the proceedings before the trial Court against the co-accused in the same FIR shall continue. Considering the fact that the offence committed by the petitioner is under Sections 452/325/308/34 IPC, the petitioner is directed to do community service by donating two units of blood i.e. one unit blood with Indian Red Cross Society, Red Cross Road, New Delhi, within two weeks from today and one unit blood after the expiry of six months therefrom with the same Society. He shall file the copy of the proof of the same within six weeks from the date of donating the blood and a copy thereof be also handed
over to the IO. In case the petitioner fails to file the same, the matter be listed before Court by the Registry for recalling of the orders passed today and the IO shall inform the learned APP for the State about the same. The petition is accordingly disposed of.
Pending application also stands disposed of. Dasti.
MANMOHAN SINGH, J.
JUNE 10, 2016/ka