High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./3245/2016

Mohd.Usman & ORS. v. The State (NCT Of Delhi) & ANR.

2016-12-08Hon'Ble Mr. Justice S.P.Garg3 pages

$~35 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 3245/2016 MOHD.USMAN & ORS.

..... Petitioners Through :

Mr.Sunil Kumar, Advocate along with petitioners present in person.

versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

..... Respondents Through :

Ms.Manjeet Arya, APP.

Mr.Shahid Ahmed, Advocate, for the complainant/R-2 along with R-2 present in person.

SI Vishvendra, PS Seema Puri.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 08.12.2016 (1) Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioners for quashing of FIR No.99/2013 under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC registered at Police Station Seemapuri. It is stated that the matter has been settled with the complainant/victim amicably before Karkardooma Courts, Delhi.

(2) Respondent No.2-complainant is present before the Court along with her counsel. The Investigating Officer present in the court has CRL.M.C. 3245/2016

identified her.

I have enquired from the complainant whether the matter has been settled with the petitioners amicably without fear and pressure. She has informed that the matter has been settled without any fear or pressure and she has no objection to the quashing of the FIR. Pursuant to the settlement a sum of `25,000/- (in cash) has been handed over to the complainant today in the court. Statement of the complainant recorded separately. Divorce by mutual consent has been granted.

(3) The petition is supported by the affidavits of the parties. Settlement/Compromise deed dated 04.02.2016 signed by the parties is on record. Divorce by mutual consent has been granted. (4) Since the complainant/Respondent No.2 has voluntarily settled the dispute with the petitioners, no useful purpose will be served to continue with the proceedings. In the interest of justice and to put an end to the litigation and to enable the parties to settle in life after divorce, FIR No.99/2013 under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC registered at Police Station Seemapuri and all the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

(5) The petition is disposed of accordingly.

S.P.GARG, J.

DECEMBER 08, 2016/sa CRL.M.C. 3245/2016

Crl.M.C.3245/2016 Statement of Respondent No.2-Gulshan, d/o Najruddin, on S.A.

I have settled the disputes with the petitioners amicably before Karkardooma Courts, Delhi. Pursuant to the settlement, I have received remaining amount of `25,000/- (in cash) today in the court. I have no objection to the quashing of the FIR No.99/2013 under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC registered at Police Station Seemapuri and all the proceedings emanating therefrom.

R.O. & A.C.

08.12.2016 S.P.GARG (JUDGE)