Vinay @ Vipin Handa v. State Govt Of NCT Of Delhi & ANR

$~16 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 1859/2017 & CRL.M.A. 7598/2017 VINAY @ VIPIN HANDA ..... Petitioner Through:

Mohd. Anas, Adv.

versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through:

Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP for State Inspector Usha Sharma, PS-Hari Nagar Mr.Raveesh Thukral, Adv. for R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA

O R D E R

% 04.09.2017 This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.366/2011, under Sections 354/506 IPC, registered at Police Station-Hari Nagar, Delhi and all proceedings emanating therefrom. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was driving scooter but due to error of judgment hit the respondent No.2 and thereafter due to some misunderstanding a quarrel had taken place between them, resultantly, the complainant lodged FIR No.366/2011, under Sections 354/506 IPC at Police Station-Hari Nagar, Delhi. He has further submitted that after registration of the FIR qua against the petitioner, the relatives and the friends intervened and the matter has been settled between the parties in the Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi vide settlement deed dated 16.01.2017. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that all disputes have been amicably settled between the parties and nothing remains to be adjudicated upon further and submits that the FIR in question is coming as hurdle in the way of the present petitioner. He further submits

that the petitioner and the respondent No.2 want to lead peaceful life in near future and since all disputes have been settled between them, the FIR in question and all proceedings arising therefrom may be quashed. The respondent No.2/complainant, Ms.Shruti Mittal is present in Court today and has been identified by the Investigating Officer Inspector Usha Sharma, PS-Hari Nagar. The respondent No.2/complainant also admits that the matter has been amicably settled with the petitioner and she has no claim or grievance left against the petitioner. She further submits that the settlement/compromise has taken place voluntarily, without any force, pressure or coercion. She further submits that she has no objection if the FIR in question is quashed.

Looking into the above facts and circumstances, since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and nothing remains to be adjudicated further, to have peace in the life of the parties, I deem it appropriate to quash the FIR No.366/2011, under Sections 354/506 IPC, registered at Police Station-Hari Nagar, Delhi, and all proceedings emanating therefrom. Parties to remain bound by the terms of settlement dated 16.01.2017.

The present petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly. All pending application(s) (if any) also stand disposed of. Copy of the order be given dasti.

I.S.MEHTA, J SEPTEMBER 04, 2017/sr