Vinita Tyagi v. Upras Vidyalaya & ORS

$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4617/2015 and CM Nos. 8359/2015 and 8361/2015 and CM No.8778/2015 VINITA TYAGI ..... Petitioner Through: Ms S. Janani and Mr Deepak Goel and Mr Sunando Rana, Advs.

versus UPRAS VIDYALAYA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr Mukesh Kher, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr Anuj Aggarwal, Additional Standing Counsel for GNCTD Ms Niti Jain, Advocate for respondent No.2

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA

O R D E R

% 29.05.2015 During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out that the complainant, Ms. Neena Kulshreshtha was a member of DAS and issued the chargesheet to the petitioner and this vitiates the entire proceedings. Learned counsel for the respondent makes a submission that the respondent be permitted to formulate a fresh DAS in terms of Rule 118 of the Delhi School Education Act & Rules, 1973 and start the enquiry afresh.

In view of the these submissions, the present writ petition has

been disposed of in the terms that the respondent can formulate the fresh DAS in terms of Rule 118 of the Delhi School Education Act & Rules, 1973.

DEEPA SHARMA, J MAY 29, 2015 sapna