Meenakshi Bansal & ANR v. The State Through NCT Delhi & ORS

$~36 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 970/2015 MEENAKSHI BANSAL & ANR ..... Petitioners Through:

Mr. Sunil K Kalra, Adv. along with petitioners in person.

Versus

THE STATE THROUGH NCT DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC. for R-1 along with SI Shri Gopal, P.S. Shakar Pur.

Mr. Vineet Mehta, Adv. for R-4 to R-6.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 26.05.2015 Respondent no. 4 is father whereas respondent nos. 5 and 6 are brother and brother-in-law of petitioner no.1. Petitioner no.1 has married petitioner no.2 of her own free will. She is major. This fact has not been disputed by the respondent nos. 4 t o 6. Respondent nos. 4 to 6 submits that they have never threatened the petitioners nor have any intention to do so since petitioner no.1 is major and has married voluntarily and of her own free will.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that at present petitioners are not receiving any threat.

He seeks leave to withdraw the petition.

Writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

MAY 26, 2015 ga