Rajbir Singh v. State

$~26.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1875/2016 RAJBIR SINGH ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Mohit Ramola, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP along with SI R.P. Singh, PS-Dwarka South, for the State.

Mr. Sanjay Rathi, Advocate for the complainant.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

O R D E R

% 16.09.2016 Crl. M.A. No.14392/2016 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.

BAIL APPLN. 1875/2016 Issue notice. Mr. Dutta accepts notice. Learned counsel for the complainant is also present in Court and accepts notice. The petitioner has moved the present bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. to seek anticipatory bail, apprehending arrest in case FIR No.321/2016 dated 23.05.2016 under Section 452/ 506/ 34 IPC registered at Police Station - Dwarka South.

The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the dispute essentially is a civil dispute in relation to a plot forming part of Khasra

No.76/3 and/or 76/9/2 in village Palam, New Delhi. A civil suit has already been filed by one Ajit Singh being Suit No.282/14 (Old No.25574/2016). Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has already joined the investigation. He submits that the allegation is that the petitioner had gone to the house of the complainant and obtained signatures forcibly on blank documents by showing weapons. Learned counsel submits that the said allegation appears to be unbelievable as the petitioner is stated to have been accompanied by his entire family.

Mr. Dutta submits that though the petitioner has joined the investigation, he has not produced the documents which are alleged to have been got signed from the complainant in blank. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that there are no such documents available with the petitioner.

In view of the aforesaid, since the petitioner has already joined the investigation and the petitioner undertakes to join investigation and cooperate with the investigation in future as well, the petition is allowed. In case of his arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon his furnishing personal bond with one surety in the sum of Rs.25,000/- to the satisfaction of the arresting officer. This is subject to the condition that the petitioner shall not get in touch with the complainant or issue any threat or coercion to the complainant.

The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. VIPIN SANGHI, J SEPTEMBER 16, 2016 B.S. Rohella