Raj Rani Choudhary v. Anupam Srivastava & ANR

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 367/2017 RAJ RANI CHOUDHARY ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Ranvir Singh, Adv.

versus ANUPAM SRIVASTAVA & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. Suryakant Singla and Ms. Drishti Harpalani, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA

O R D E R

% 14.12.2017 Instant contempt petition has come to be filed alleging violation of the order dated 8.2.2017. Perusal of the petition and the order dated 8.2.2017 passed by the Division Bench of this Court would show that the order of Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated 10.5.2016 was allowed to be implemented in six weeks' time. During the course of hearing, Mr. Singla, ld. counsel for the respondents points out that the satisfaction of the order dated 10.5.2016 in terms of the order dated 8.2.2017 has already come to be recorded by CAT in its order dated 27.10.2017, a copy whereof is annexed as Annexure P11 to the rejoinder filed by the petitioner itself. When the satisfaction has already been recorded by CAT, the petition does not survive and is disposed off accordingly.

A. K. CHAWLA, J DECEMBER 14, 2017 rc