Ved Prakash v. State

$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1424/2017 VED PRAKASH ..... Petitioner Through Mr.K. Singhal, Adv.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr.Sanjay Lao, ASC for State with Insp.Narender Singh, SHO.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL

O R D E R

% 02.08.2017 1.

The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of parole for a period of three months in order to enable him to look after his old aged wife and to maintain social ties with his family and society.

2.

Status/Verification report has been filed today which is taken on record.

3.

Nominal roll has also been placed on record.

4.

As per the status report, the address where the petitioner would be residing in case he is released on parole has been verified and found to be correct.

5.

In these circumstances, to enable the petitioner to look after his old aged wife and to maintain social ties with his family and society, he be released on Parole for a period of one month from the date of his release on

the following terms and conditions: - (i) he shall furnish his personal bond in the sum of Rs.5,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Jail Superintendent.

(ii) the petitioner shall maintain good conduct and behaviour during his release.

(iii) the petitioner shall not leave the National Capital Territory of Delhi.

(iv) the petitioner shall provide one mobile number of the surety which will be kept active and will not be changed without the permission of the Court.

(v) he shall report to the SHO of the area every Monday and Thursday.

6.

The petition is disposed of accordingly.

7.

Copy of this order be sent to the Jail Superintendent. 8.

Copy of this order be given dasti.

VINOD GOEL, J.

AUGUST 02, 2017/jitender