Sushil Harrison v. The Principal, St. Stephen College & ORS

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 04, 2018 + W.P.(C) 8296/2016 & CM 34333/2016 SUSHIL HARRISON .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. P.C. Jha, Advocate versus THE PRINCIPAL, ST. STEPHEN COLLEGE & ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Romy Chacko, Advocate for respondent No. 1 Mr. Santosh Kumar and Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Advocates for respondent No. 2 Ms. Isha Mital and Mr. Apoorv Kurup, Advocates for respondent No. 3-UGC

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

O R D E R

(ORAL) 1.

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that since respondentCollege has already made appointment on the post of Library Attendant, therefore, this petition is not pressed. However, a prayer is made that petitioner may be permitted to continue as Office Attendant on contract basis in the respondent-College.

2.

Learned counsel for respondent-College submits that petitioner's employment as Office Attendant on contract basis is not being ended. 3.

It is submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that regarding nonpayment of increment, a Representation would be made to the Principal W.P.(C) 8296/2016

of respondent-College within six weeks from today. If such a Representation is received by the Principal of respondent-College, then it be effectively dealt with expeditiously.

4.

With aforesaid observations, this petition and application are disposed of as not pressed.

(SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE APRIL 04, 2018 s W.P.(C) 8296/2016