Ravi Kumar v. Namrata Harjai @ Silky

$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 147/2016 RAVI KUMAR ..... Appellant Represented by:

Mr.D.K.Pradhan & Mr.Gautam K.Laha, Advocates versus NAMRATA HARJAI @ SILKY ..... Respondent Represented by:

None

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

O R D E R

% 19.10.2016 CM Nos.38224-25/2016 Allowed subject to all just exceptions.

CM No.38223/2016 1.

There is a delay of 713 days in filing the appeal. The only ground for delay to be condoned in filing the appeal pleaded is that after the decision the applicant and his relatives were trying their level best for amicable resolution of the dispute with the respondent. 2.

We do not find this to be a sufficient cause to condone 713 days delay in filing the appeal.

3.

Vide impugned order dated September 23, 2014 petition filed by the appellant for restitution of conjugal rights has been dismissed. 4.

CM No.38223/2016 is therefore dismissed.

MAT.APP.(F.C.) 147/2016

MAT.APP.(F.C.) 147/2016 Since delay in filing the appeal has not been condoned, the appeal is dismissed as not maintainable.

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

PRATIBHA RANI, J.

OCTOBER 19, 2016/'pg'

MAT.APP.(F.C.) 147/2016