Amit Madan & ORS v. State (NCT Of Delhi) & ANR

$~35.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2705/2016 AMIT MADAN & ORS ..... Petitioners Through:

Mr. Dharmender Sharma & Mr.Anil Kumar Saini, Advocates.

versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through:

Ms.

Richa Kapoor, ASC and Mr.Ashish Negi & Ms. Seema Patnaha, Advocates along with SI Mohit Parkash, PS-Hari Nagar, for the State.

Mr. Davinder Kumar, Advocate for the complainant.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

O R D E R

% 16.09.2016 The petitioners have filed the present petition seeking quashing of FIR No.508/2015 registered on the complaint of the complainant under Sections 498A/ 406/ 34 IPC against the petitioners.

The complainant is present in Court. She is identified by her counsel. The petitioner No.1 and the respondent No.2 were married according to Hindu rites on 17.01.2012. Since disputes arose between the parties, they

started living separately and respondent No.2 filed her complaint leading to registration of the aforesaid FIR at Police Station Hari Nagar. The parties have arrived at a settlement on 10.08.2015 in Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, which has been placed on record. Under the settlement, out of the total settlement amount of Rs.7,80,000/-, Rs.2,60,000/- has been received at the time of first motion; Rs.2,60,000/- has been received at the time of second motion; and Rs.2,60,000/- has been paid today in Court. The complainant states that she has not been subjected to any pressure or coercion and that she has entered the settlement out of her own free will. The complainant further states that she joins the prayer for quashing of the FIR in question. Accordingly, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding further with the FIR in question and the proceedings emanating therefrom. The same are hereby quashed.

Dasti.

VIPIN SANGHI, J SEPTEMBER 16, 2016 B.S. Rohella