Raj Kumar v. State (Govt Of NCT Of Delhi)

$~1,2,6&7 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 1926/2016 SUKHBIR Petitioner Representedby:

Mr. SumitChoudhary, Advocate.

versus ) Respondent Ms. Rajni Gupta,APPwith SI Somveer Singh.

Mr. S. Khan, Advocate for the complainant.

STATE(GOVT.OFNCTOFDELHI Represented by:

BAIL APPLN. 1969/2016 Petitioner Mr. Sumit Choudhary, Advocate.

SUNltA Representedby:

versus Respondent Mr. Ravi Nayak,APPwith SI Somveer Singh.

Mr. S. Khan, Advocate for the complainant.

STATE Representedby:

BAIL APPLN. 1885/2016 + Petitioner Mr. Sumit Choudhary, Advocate.

SACHINVERMA Represented by:

versus THE STATE(GOVT.OF NOT OF DELHI) Respondent Representedby:

Mr. HireinSharma,APP with SI Somveer Singh.

Mr. S. Khan, Advocate for the complainant.

BAILAPPLN.1926/2016,1969/2016,1885/2016&1925/2016 By:AMULYA

o + BAIL APPLN. 1925/2016 RAJKUMAR Petitioner Representedby:

Mr. SumitChoudhary, Advocate.

versus STATE(GOVTOF NOT OF DELHI) Respondent Representedby:

Ms. RajniGupta,AFP with SI Somveer Singh.

Mr. S. Khan, Advocate for the complainant.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

ORDER

0/„ 06.02.2017 Repeatedlyadjournmentshave been soughtby the petitioneron the pretextthatthe paymentwouldbe made whichis the solebasisfor grantof interimprotectionto the petitioner,howeverthe petitionerdespite having availedthe benefitofinterimprotectionhas notmadepayments. Interimorderinfavourofthe petitionerare vacated. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petitions.

Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

FEBRUARY 06,2017 'ga'

BAILAPPLN.1926/2016,1969/2016,1885/2016&1925/2016