Kamal Singh v. Raj Devi

$~47 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ RC.REV. 287/2017 & CM No.21107/2017 KAMAL SINGH ..... Petitioner Through:

Ms. Amrit Kaur Oberoi with Mr. Siddharth Bhardwaj, Advocates.

versus RAJ DEVI ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Sushil Kumar with Mr. Varun Kumar, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA

O R D E R

% 22.03.2018 RC.REV. 287/2017 & CM No.21107/2017 After some hearing, the counsel for the respondent who was the petitioner before the Rent Controller in the eviction case which was allowed by order dated 18.02.2017 after rejection of the application of the petitioner for leave to contest, on instructions, fairly concedes that triable issues arise and, therefore, the leave to contest may be granted and the revision petition may be allowed and the impugned order dated 18.02.2017 may be set aside with all consequential directions to follow this, of course, without prejudice to the contentions of both sides.

In view of the above, the petition and the application filed therewith stand allowed. The impugned order is set aside. The leave to contest to the petitioner stands granted. The proceedings before the RC.REV. 287/2017

Rent Controller consequentially stand revived. They shall be taken up by the Rent Controller for further proceedings in accordance with law on 24th April, 2018 when the parties are directed to remain present. Needless to add, the petitioner shown as respondent in the eviction case will be obliged to submit the written statement on the afore-said date fixed for first appearance.

Dasti.

R.K.GAUBA, J MARCH 22, 2018 srb RC.REV. 287/2017