Suresh Shrimali v. State

$~43 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 1931/2017 & CRL. M. A. 7931/2017 SURESH SHRIMALI ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr. Rishabh Sancheti, Adv. with Ms. Padma Priya, Adv.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :

Dr. M. P. Singh, APP for State Mr. Jaideep Malik, Adv. for Complainant.

SI Manish, EOW

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 24.01.2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that ` 7.5 lacs has already been deposited in terms of the order dated 17.05.2017. Petitioner has no objection in case petition is disposed of in terms of the interim order dated 17.05.2017. Learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 says that the complainant has no objection in case the petition is disposed of in terms of the interim order, whereby condition of deposit of ` 20 lacs was reduced to ` 7.5 lacs. Ordered accordingly.

Petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 17.05.2017. Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous. A.K. PATHAK, J JANUARY 24, 2018 SRwt