Chetna v. State

$~56 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 1945/2017 CHETNA ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Javed Ahmed and Ms. Syed Maria, Advs.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with SI Richa Sharma, P.S. Punjabi Bagh.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 28.05.2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was declared proclaimed offender even though she was not served properly. Petitioner was not living at the addresses where notice was purportedly affixed. Petitioner shall file appropriate application before the trial court. He seeks leave to withdraw the petition.

Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

MAY 28, 2018 ga