Manish Arora v. Meenakshi Arora

$~68 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3486/2016 and Crl.M.A. No. 14723/2016 MANISH ARORA ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Brahmanad Gupta, Advocate versus MEENAKSHI ARORA ..... Respondent Through:

Ms.__, Advocate (appearance not given)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA

O R D E R

% 24.01.2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to file his vakalatnama.

A submission is made on behalf of the petitioner seeking to withdraw his petition in view of the stated settlement arrived at between the parties to the petitioner. The statement of the petitioner has thus been recorded.

In view of the submission made by the Crl.M.C. and the accompanying application are thus dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed.

ANU MALHOTRA, J JANUARY 24, 2018/sv

Item No.68 Crl.M.C. No. 3486/2016 MANISH ARORA VS. MEENAKSHI ARORA STATEMENT OF MANISH ARORA, S/O SITA RAM ARORA, AGED 38 YEARS, R/O 6/74, GROUND FLOOR, RAJ NAGAR GHAZIABAD, U.P. ON S.A.

I am a post graduate. Previously I was working as a software engineer and presently I am not gainfully engaged.

I seek to withdraw the Crl.M.C. No. 3486/2016 assailing the impugned order dated 14.7.2016 in CA No.1164/16 under Section 29 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 of the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in view of the settlement arrived at between me and the respondent. I have stated so of my own accord without any duress, pressure or coercion from any quarter.

RO & AC ANU MALHOTRA, J.

24.01.2018