Sushil Jain v. Pankaj Dayal

$~18&19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + EX.P. 127/2016 SUSHIL JAIN ..... Decree Holder Through:

Ms. Pooja Vohra, Adv.

Versus

PANKAJ DAYAL ..... Judgement Debtor Through:

Mr. Lokesh Bhola, Adv. for objector.

AND EX.P. 128/2016 SOBHAGYA MAL JAIN ..... Decree Holder Through:

Ms. Pooja Vohra, Adv.

Versus

PANKAJ DAYAL ..... Judgement Debtor Through:

Mr. Lokesh Bhola, Adv. for objector.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW

O R D E R

% 26.02.2019 EA No.84/2019 in EX.P. 127/2016 & EA No.82/2019 in EX.P. 128/2016 (both for exemption) 1.

Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

2.

The application is disposed of.

EA No.83/2019 in EX.P. 127/2016 & EA No.81/2019 in EX.P. 128/2016 (both for interim relief) 3.

The counsel for the objector Meters & Instruments Pvt. Ltd. states that though objections were also filed to the execution but the same have not been listed.

4.

The counsel for the decree holders states she has not received copies. EX.P. 127/2016 & EX.P. 126/2016

5.

Copies of the objections as well as the application for interim relief be furnished to the counsel for the decree holder in the course of the day, under acknowledgement.

6.

The counsel for the objector to also serve the counsel for the judgement debtor and inform him of the next date of hearing. 7.

List on 23rd April, 2019.

8.

It is made clear that there is no stay of execution of the decrees which have been transferred for execution to the District Judge, Chandigarh. RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.

FEBRUARY 26, 2019 'bs'..