Rahul Raj Purohit v. State & ANR.

$~32.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2716/2016 RAHUL RAJ PUROHIT ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. S.S. Bagga, Advocate versus STATE & ANR.

..... Respondent Through:

Ms. Kamna Vohra, ASC with SI Ashok Kumar

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

O R D E R

% 19.09.2016 The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking quashing of FIR No.866/2015 registered on the complaint of the complainant under Section 420 IPC against the petitioner.

The complainant is present in Court. He is identified by the Investigating Officer. He has also produced his ID card, which has been shown to the Court and returned.

The parties have arrived at a settlement on 10.07.2016, which has been placed on record. Under the settlement, out of the total settlement amount of Rs.1,00,000/-, the complainant has already received an amount of Rs.20,000/-. The balance amount of Rs.80,000/- has been tendered to him in

Court today. The complainant states that he has not been subjected to any pressure or coercion and that he has entered the settlement out of his own free will. The complainant further states that he joins the prayer for quashing of the FIR in question.

Accordingly, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding further with the FIR in question and the proceedings emanating therefrom. The same are hereby quashed.

Dasti.

VIPIN SANGHI, J SEPTEMBER 19, 2016 sr