Anil Kumar v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation

$~61 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8363/2016 & CM APPL. 55865/2023 ANIL KUMAR .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Bhaskar Upadhyay, Advocate.

versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION .....Respondent Through:

Ms. Saroj Bidawat, Standing Counsel for MCD.

Mr. Rajiv Bakshi, Mr. Kajal Sharma and Mr.

Pranav Pareek, Advocates for Intervenor in CM APPL. 55865/2023.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH

O R D E R

% 03.03.2025 1.

Ms. Saroj Bidawat, learned Standing Counsel for MCD submits that MCD has no jurisdiction to carry out any demolition with respect to wall in question in the premises as it is neither an encroachment nor an unauthorised construction on public street and writ petition involves a private dispute between the Petitioner and the Intervenors.

2.

Learned counsel for Petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw this writ petition to take recourse to appropriate civil remedies. 3.

Writ petition along with pending application is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for in accordance with law, making it clear that this Court has not entered into the merits of the case. JYOTI SINGH, J MARCH 3, 2025 S.Sharma The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/03/2025 at 12:18:56