High Court of DelhiW.P.(CRL)/2740/2016

Vikram Kharbanda v. State (NCT Of Delhi) & ANR

2018-04-16Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Mukta Gupta2 pages

$41 to43 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 2733/2016 & Crl.M.A.No.14572/2016 GANDHARAV KHARBANDA Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Rake sh Maihotra, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR Respondents Represented by: Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for State with Ms.Jyoti Babbar, Advocate Mr.Anwesh Madhukar and Ms.Pranjal Shekhar, Advocates for R- + W.P.(CRL) 2735/2016 & CrI.M.A.No.14575/2016 TAGORE KHARBANDA Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Rakesh Maihotra, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Represented by: Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for State with Ms.Jyoti Babbar, Advocate + W.P.(CRL) 2740/2016 & Crl.M.A.No.14599/2016 VIKRAM KHARBANDA Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Rakesh Maihotra, Advocate , versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Represented by: Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for State with Ms.Jyoti Babbar, Advocate

CORAM:

By:AMULYA

I ~/ HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

ORDER

% 16.04.2018 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the petitions with liberty to file fresh petitions in case repert under Section 173 TP€ is filed against the petitioners and cognizance thereon is taken or in case charges are framed against the petitioners. Leave and liberty granted.

The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

MUKTA tUPTA, J.

APRIL 16, 2018 mamftz