Madan v. State (Govt. Of NCT)

$~57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2761/2016 MADAN ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate.

versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) ..... Respondent Through Mr. Tushar Sannu, Advocate for the State with SHO OP Thakur, police station Timar Pur.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 07.10.2016 Annu Kumari @ Manisha and Digvijay Singh Badana @ Manish are present in the Court. Both of them state that they have got married and would like to live and reside with each other. Digvijay Singh Badana @ Manish states that he had voluntarily gone to Mumbai with Annu Kumari @ Manisha.

Digamber Singh, father of Digvijay Singh Badana @ Manish is present in the Court and states that Digvijay Singh Badana @ Manish is minor, his date of birth being 20th July, 1999. Be that as it may, the petitioner i.e. father of Annu Kumari @ Manisha has spoken to Annu Kumari @ Manisha. Annu Kumari has

informed her father that she want to live and reside with Digvijay Singh Badana @ Manish.

In view of the aforesaid position, no further orders or directions are required in the present case. It is open to Annu Kumari @ Manisha and Digvijay Singh Badana @ Manish to stay at the residence of the petitioner for few days if they so wish and desire. Parties including parents of Annu Kumari @ Manisha and Digvijay Singh Badana @ Manish are at liberty to visit the Family Court at Tis Hazari Court Complex and interact with the counsellor attached with the said Court.

SANJIV KHANNA, J SUNITA GUPTA, J OCTOBER 07, 2016 NA