Rakesh @ Nipal v. State

$~13 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 2841/2016 RAKESH @ NIPAL ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Puneet Singhal, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Sanjay Lao, ASC

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 26.10.2016 The petitioner has prayed for grant of parole, inter alia, on the ground that he intends to file a special leave petition in the Supreme Court. It is trite to say that every convict/accused is entitled to exhaust all the legal remedies, as may be available to him/her upto the highest forum. The address of the petitioner has been verified.

Keeping in view the totality of circumstances, the petitioner be released on parole for a period of one month from the date of his release, subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of `10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with one surety in the like amount, to the satisfaction of Jail Superintendent. On completion of the parole period, petitioner shall surrender before the Jail Superintendent. The petitioner shall report to the

Station House Officer, Police Station : Maurya Enclave, Delhi once in a week, i.e., on Mondays.

The petition is disposed of in the above terms. A copy of the order be sent to Jail Superintendent for serving it on the petitioner and also for compliance.

A.K. PATHAK, J OCTOBER 26, 2016 tp