Vinod Kumar Gupta v. Delhi Jal Board & ANR.

$~44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4341/2017 VINOD KUMAR GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Suresh Tripathy, Adv.

versus DELHI JAL BOARD & ANR.

..... Respondents Through: Mr Sumit Pushkarna, Adv. and Mr Lalit Kumar (Vigilance Officer)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA

O R D E R

% 19.05.2017 CM APPL. 18889/2017 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 4341/2017 and CM APPL. 18890/2017 (stay) After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition. At the same time, he stated that the petitioner had not responded to the memorandum raising charges against him and he also submits that the enquiry may be expedited.

In the interest of justice, the petitioner is granted one last opportunity to respond to the memorandum of charge within seven days from today. In case the same is so filed before the Competent Authority, it is hoped that the Competent Authority shall expedite the

process of holding the enquiry, if any, against the petitioner and concluding the same in a reasonable time.

The petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.

VIPIN SANGHI, J DEEPA SHARMA, J MAY 19, 2017 bg