High Court of DelhiTR.P.(C.)/84/2017
Mohit Mehta v. Nayanika Thakur
2017-10-31Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw1 pages
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + TR.P.(C.) 84/2017 MOHIT MEHTA ..... Petitioner Through:
Mr. Anip Sachthey, Dr. Harish Uppal, Mr. Tileshwar Prasad, Ms. Anjali Chauhan and Ms. Ria Sachthey, Advs.
Versus
NAYANIKA THAKUR ..... Respondent Through:
Mr. Anil K. Aggarwal, Md. Imteyaz and Mr. Mannu Singh, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
O R D E R
% 31.10.2017 1.
The counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition. 2.
The counsel for the respondent to whom notice was ordered to be issued states that the withdrawal should be subject to costs under Section 407(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. 3.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
No costs.
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.
OCTOBER 31, 2017 Bs..