Rakhi & ANR v. State (NCT Of Delhi) & ORS

3# $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1596/2017 RAKHI & ANR ..... Petitioners Represented by:

None.

versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by:

Mr. Sanjay Lao, Additional Standing Counsel for State with SI Shailendra K. Singh, PS Gokulpuri.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 04.12.2017 Crl. M.A. No. 8874/2017 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(CRL) 1596/2017 1.

None for the petitioners.

2.

Even on the last date none appeared on behalf of the petitioners. 3.

Learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State submits that the FIR being FIR No. 159/2017 under Section 365 IPC was registered on the complaint of father of the petitioner No.1 in which a cancellation report has been filed as both the petitioners are major and in her statement recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C and 164 Cr.P.C. the petitioner No.1 stated that she got married to petitioner No.2 of her own free will. 4.

Status report has been handed over which is taken on record. W.P.(CRL) 1596/2017

5.

Since none is present on behalf of the petitioners, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

DECEMBER 04, 2017 'vn'

W.P.(CRL) 1596/2017