High Court of DelhiBAIL APPLN./1986/2016

Vinod v. State

2016-12-21Hon'Ble Mr. Justice I.S.Mehta2 pages

$~2 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 1986/2016 VINOD ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Sumit Kumar and Mr.Prakash Kashyap, Advocates.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr.G.M.Farooqui, APP for State with Insp. Uma Datt and SI Kailash Kumar, P.S. Mangol Puri, Delhi.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA

O R D E R

% 21.12.2016 This is an application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. filed on behalf of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.790/2016, under Section 308/34 IPC, registered at Police Station Mangol Puri, Delhi.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person having no nexus with the FIR No.790/2016, under Section 308/34 IPC, registered at Police Station Mangol Puri, Delhi. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in the above case. He further submits that the petitioner has already joined the investigation in this case and nothing remains to be recovered from the

possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital. Learned APP for the State, on the other hand, vehemently opposes the anticipatory bail application and submitted that the petitioner is the main accused who hit the injured.

Looking into the above facts and circumstances of the case, since the petitioner has already joined the investigation and that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital, the petitioner is further directed to join the investigation as and when required and in the event of his arrest, the petitioner be admitted on bail, on his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer/SHO concerned with the condition that the petitioner shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence and shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court concerned and he shall not contact the complainant in any manner. This order shall not affect the merits of the case.

The present bail application is disposed of in the above terms. Copy of this order be given dasti, as prayed. I.S.MEHTA, J DECEMBER 21, 2016 'dc'