M/S Inter Ikea Systems Bv v. Praveen Saankar & ORS

$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 371/2017 & I.A.No.6230/2017 M/S INTER IKEA SYSTEMS BV ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Prithvi Singh, Advocate.

versus PRAVEEN SAANKAR & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr.Rohit Sharma with Mr.Anshul Chowdhary and Mr.Mohit Aneja, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

O R D E R

% 24.11.2017 I.A.No.13913/2017 Present joint application has been filed under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC. The same is duly signed by learned counsel for the parties to the litigation.

Present application is also supported by affidavits of constituted attorney of the plaintiff and the defendants. Both the learned counsel state that the matter has been compromised in accordance with the terms mentioned in the present application.

Both the learned counsel further assure and undertake to this Court that the parties shall comply with the settlement terms mentioned in the present application.

The aforesaid statements, assurances and undertakings as well

as undertakings given by learned counsel for the parties are accepted by this Court and parties are held bound by the same. This Court has also perused the compromise application and is of the opinion that the same is lawful.

Consequently, the suit is decreed in terms of para 35 (a) and (b) of the plaint and in accordance with the settlement terms mentioned in the present application, a copy of which is marked as Ex. C-1. Registry is directed to prepare a decree sheet accordingly. Registry is also directed to issue to the plaintiff a certificate authorizing it to receive back from the Collector the half amount of the Court fee paid by it in the present suit. With the aforesaid observations, present application is allowed and the suit and pending application stand disposed of. The interim order dated 19th May, 2017 stand vacated. MANMOHAN, J NOVEMBER 24, 2017 KA