Purushottam Goyel v. State Of NCT Of Delhi

$~35 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 1678/2017 PURUSHOTTAM GOYEL ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Prashant Mehta, Adv. with Mr.Alok Tripathi, Adv.

versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Ms.Nandita Rao, ASC with Mr.

Archit Vashistha & Ms.Srilina Roy, Advs.

SI Lalit Kumar PS I.P. Estate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR

O R D E R

% 31.05.2017 Crl.M.A. 9303/2017 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.

W.P.(Crl.) 1678/2017 The petitioner has sought protection from the police because he apprehends disturbance at the youth centre. It has been submitted that one Smt.Indira Mayaram has been threatening to dispossess him from the office at Jawahar Lal Nehru Youth Centre, Delhi.

The status report has been filed by Ms.Nandita Rao, learned ASC which is taken on record.

The status report reveals that on the asking of the petitioner, an

arrangement has been made whereby patrolling staff, beat staff and Division officer have been instructed to keep a close watch of the area so as to ensure that no one takes law into his own hands.

The petitioner has also been provided with the mobile telephone number of the SHO of the concerned police station with an assurance that whenever any distress call would be made by the petitioner, the same would be responded promptly.

The mobile telephone numbers of other police officers including the beat staff will also be provided to the petitioner for the needful.

In view of the action already taken by the respondent/police and the assurance given by the officer incharge of the concerned police station of providing all protection to the petitioner, no further order need be passed. The petition is disposed of.

ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J MAY 31, 2017 ab