Saidujama v. The State

$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2172/2017 SAIDUJAMA ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Upendra Bahadur, Advocate versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP Mr. Harish Chander, Advocate For the complainant, along with Complainant in person.

SI Rakesh Kumar, PS Jafrabad

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 24.05.2017 Crl.M A No. 8895/2017 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Crl. M C No. 2172/2017

(1) Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioner for quashing of FIR No.316/2012, under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC and Section 4 of D.P.Act, Police Station Jafrabad. It is stated that the matter has been settled with the complainant/respondent No.2 amicably and the parties are living together.

(2) Respondent No.2-complainant is present before the Court along with her counsel. The Investigating Officer has identified her. I have enquired from the complainant whether the matter has been settled Crl. M C 2172/2017

with the petitioner amicably without fear and pressure. She has informed that the matter has been settled without any fear or pressure and she has no objection to the quashing of the FIR. Pursuant to the settlement, the parties are living together since 7th July, 2013. (3) The petition is supported by the affidavits of the parties. (4) Since the complainant/Respondent No.2 has voluntarily settled the dispute with the petitioner, no useful purpose will be served to continue with the proceedings. In the interest of justice and to put an end to the litigation, FIR No.316/2012, registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and Section 4 D.P.Act at Police Station Jafrabad and all the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. (5) The petition is disposed of accordingly.

S.P.GARG, J.

MAY 24, 2017/P Crl. M C 2172/2017