Naseem Ahmed v. State

$~16 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 1988/2016 NASEEM AHMED ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr.Kapil Singhal, Advocate with Mr.Ankit Singhal, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :

Mr.Kamal K.Ghei, APP with SI Dinesh Kumar, PS Seelampur.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 15.12.2016 1.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.380/2016 registered under Sections 365/323/34 IPC at PS Seelampur. Status report is on record.

2.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. By an order dated 26.09.2016, the petitioner was granted interim protection and was directed to join the investigation as and when required. Undisputedly, the petitioner has joined the investigation since then.

Co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory / regular bail by the Court below. Learned APP was unable to disclose even after getting instructions from the Investigating Officer as to what was the nature of injuries sustained by the victim.

BAIL APPLN. 1988/2016

3.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail and in the event of arrest, he be released on furnishing personal bond in the sum of ` 40,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the SHO/Investigating officer. He shall, however, join the investigation as and when required.

4.

The bail application stands disposed of.

S.P.GARG, J DECEMBER 15, 2016 / tr BAIL APPLN. 1988/2016