Kanchan Shukla v. Union Of India & ORS.

It Signed By:RAM DATT Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

#15-16 $~ *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 8751/2014 & CM APPL. 20102/2014 POONAM & ANR.

Petitioners Through Ms. Sumbul Nizam, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Respondents Through Mr. Bhagvan Swamp Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Rachit Goel, Advocate for R-l/UOI.

Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC (Civil), GNCTD with Ms. Astha Nigam, Advocate for R-2/PWD.

WITH + W.P.(C) 8831/2014 & CM APPL. 20265/2014 KANCHAN SHUKLA Petitioner Through Ms. Sumbul Nizam, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Respondents Through Mr. Bhagvan Swamp Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Rachit Goel, Advocate for R-l/UOI.

Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC (Civil), GNCTD for R-2/PWD.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR.

JUSTICE MANMOHAN

r V?

ORDER

% 28.03.2016 Petitioners have filed the present writ petitions claiming to be owners of land in Basai Darapur and have sought stay of demolition. Respondents in their counter-affidavits have stated that as the structures of the petitioners fell on the right of way i.e. public road, the same were demolished by PWD in November 2014.

On 1 May, 2015, this Court had directed fresh unauthorised conj^ructions to be also demolished.

Today in Court, a copy of the demolition report has been handed over by learned counsel for respondents to learned counsel for petitioners. Keeping in view the aforesaid demarcation report, this Court is of the view that serious disputed questions of fact arise for consideration. Accordingly, present writ petitions and applications are dismissed with liberty to petitioners to avail of other remedies in accordance with law. 1/ MANMOHAN, J MARCH 28,2016 m